Skip to content

Conversation

@NathanFlurry
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@vercel vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – rivetkit-serverless December 23, 2025 22:44 Inactive
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 23, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
rivet-site Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 2, 2026 11:37pm
rivetkit-serverless Error Error Jan 2, 2026 11:37pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
rivet-cloud Ignored Ignored Jan 2, 2026 11:37pm
rivet-inspector Ignored Ignored Preview Jan 2, 2026 11:37pm

Copy link
Member Author

NathanFlurry commented Dec 23, 2025

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Dec 23, 2025

PR Review: Document Abort Signal

Overview

This PR adds documentation for the abort signal feature in Rivet Actors, covering both automatic cleanup on actor shutdown and manual cancellation of long-running operations.


Code Quality & Documentation ✅

Strengths:

  • Clear, practical examples that demonstrate real-world use cases
  • Good cross-referencing between the two new sections (actions.mdx ↔ lifecycle.mdx)
  • Consistent with existing documentation style and patterns
  • Examples follow TypeScript best practices

Suggestions for Improvement

1. Expand the Manual Cancellation Example (actions.mdx:248-280)

The current example shows chaining c.abortSignal with a custom AbortController, but it has a subtle issue:

Issue: The custom controller stored in c.vars.controller could be overwritten if multiple generate actions run concurrently, making cancel potentially abort the wrong operation.

Suggestion: Consider adding a note about this limitation or showing a more robust pattern for handling multiple concurrent operations, or add a comment explaining the single-operation assumption.


2. Add Error Handling Guidance (actions.mdx:248-280)

When an AbortSignal fires, fetch throws an AbortError. Consider showing how to handle this gracefully in the documentation.


3. Clarify Timing of c.abortSignal (lifecycle.mdx:619-641)

The documentation states the signal fires "when the actor is stopping" but doesnt clarify the exact timing:

  • Does it fire before onSleep?
  • Does it fire before onDestroy?
  • What happens if an action is still running?

Consider adding a brief note about the lifecycle order.


4. Consider Adding a Warning

Since onSleep might not always fire (as noted in lifecycle.mdx:196), consider adding a note that c.abortSignal is more reliable for cleanup in crash scenarios.


Security Considerations ✅

No security concerns. The examples demonstrate proper signal handling without introducing vulnerabilities.


Performance Considerations ✅

The examples are efficient:

  • Properly chains abort signals without creating unnecessary listeners
  • Cleans up resources appropriately
  • No performance anti-patterns

Test Coverage

Question: Are there existing tests for c.abortSignal behavior? Consider adding tests that verify:

  • Signal fires during actor sleep
  • Signal fires during actor destroy
  • In-flight operations are properly cancelled
  • Multiple operations handle abortion correctly

Minor Suggestions

  1. Consistency: In actions.mdx:262, consider using c.abortSignal.addEventListener("abort", ...) on a separate line for readability (matching the style in lifecycle.mdx:632)

  2. Link verification: Ensure the cross-reference links work correctly:

    • /docs/actors/lifecycle#actor-shutdown-abort-signal
    • /docs/actors/actions#canceling-long-running-actions

Summary

This is a solid documentation addition that fills an important gap. The examples are practical and well-written. The suggestions above would make the documentation even more robust by addressing edge cases and providing clearer guidance on error handling and concurrent operations.

Recommendation:Approve with minor suggestions

The PR is good to merge as-is, but consider the suggestions above for a future iteration to make the documentation more comprehensive.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 3, 2026

PR Review: Document Abort Signal

Summary

This PR adds documentation for the abort signal feature in Rivet Actors, covering both automatic cleanup on actor shutdown and manual cancellation of long-running actions.

Code Quality ✅

Strengths:

  • Clear, well-structured documentation with practical examples
  • Good cross-referencing between related sections (actions ↔ lifecycle)
  • Examples follow existing documentation patterns and conventions
  • Code samples are complete and realistic

Documentation Style:

  • Follows the existing mdx format consistently
  • Proper use of code blocks with TypeScript syntax highlighting
  • Good section organization and heading structure

Content Review

actions.mdx (lines 248-280):

  • ✅ New "Canceling Long-Running Actions" section demonstrates manual abort control
  • ✅ Shows how to chain custom AbortController with c.abortSignal for dual control
  • ✅ Practical chat generation example is relevant and clear
  • ✅ Correctly references lifecycle documentation for automatic cleanup

lifecycle.mdx (lines 619-641):

  • ✅ New "Actor Shutdown Abort Signal" section explains automatic cancellation
  • ✅ Clean fetch example demonstrates the primary use case
  • ✅ Correctly references actions documentation for manual cancellation
  • ✅ Positioned logically in the "Advanced" section

Technical Accuracy ✅

The documentation correctly describes:

  • How c.abortSignal fires when actor is stopping (sleep/destroy)
  • Proper integration with fetch API signal parameter
  • How to chain abort signals using addEventListener
  • The relationship between automatic and manual cancellation

Suggestions for Improvement

  1. Clarify abort signal behavior (minor):

    • Consider adding a note about whether the abort signal fires during crashes or only graceful shutdowns
    • Similar to how onSleep docs mention "may not always be called in situations like crashes"
  2. Add error handling example (optional):

    • The fetch examples could show how to handle abort errors
  3. Vars type annotation (minor):

    • In the manual cancellation example, consider adding explicit type annotation for clarity

Security Considerations ✅

No security concerns. The abort signal pattern is a standard browser API used correctly.

Test Coverage

Not applicable - this is documentation only.

Conclusion

Overall Assessment: Excellent

This is a well-crafted documentation addition that:

  • Addresses an important feature gap
  • Provides clear, practical examples
  • Maintains consistency with existing docs
  • Correctly cross-references related content

The suggestions above are minor enhancements and do not block merging. The PR is ready to merge as-is.


Review generated with Claude Code

@jog1t jog1t force-pushed the 12-23-chore_docs_document_abort_signal branch from ee5f7b8 to 9f0dc33 Compare January 3, 2026 00:05
@jog1t jog1t force-pushed the 12-23-chore_rivetkit_clean_up_logging_configuration branch from 4c79885 to 479a600 Compare January 3, 2026 00:05
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 12-23-chore_docs_document_abort_signal branch from 9f0dc33 to ee5f7b8 Compare January 5, 2026 02:45
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 12-23-chore_rivetkit_clean_up_logging_configuration branch from 479a600 to 4c79885 Compare January 5, 2026 02:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants